January-September 2001 - Getting the
framework right - Public support frameworks and strategies for local and micro-finance.Challenge - The partners
- Case Studies
The issue
During the last 10 to 20 years a new generation of
financial organisations has emerged Europe-wide serving groups of people, sectors and
regions that the mainstream banking sector is either no more willing or able to serve.
These instruments include notably micro-finance organisations helping people to start
their micro-businesses and development and community funds serving the local economy, as
well as eco-banks financing small businesses in the emerging environment sector and credit
co-operatives financing the social economy at large. INAISE, one of the partners in this
project, is precisely an international network of about 50 such new financial
organisations trying to fill this widening funding gap at the local and lower ends of the
economy.
One of the weak points in the development of these new
financial instruments has been the support from the government side, especially at the
national and European levels. Not all these new financial instruments necessarily need
government support, but some of them do, like those micro-finance organisations which are
not self-sufficient. Others simply need a legal framework to exist and to function
properly. But almost all of them would be able to operate at a more significant scale and
have a larger impact if they were more proficiently supported and used.
Although public authorities are usually easily
convinced of the efficiency and usefulness of local and micro-finance instruments, notably
in terms of job creation, too often the support frameworks are not well designed, though
well intended. This "weakness" of public support does not refer necessarily to
funding as such, but more to the design of the support, i.e. (1) who may access it,
(2) how, (3) to serve whom and (4) in what way and with what time-frame?
The result of this is that local and micro-finance
organisations, even if able to access public support, may end up in unnecessary dependency
relations, have their main focus turned away from the public they serve, be led to spend
money rather than to scrupulously care for it to come back, have a glut of funding for one
aspect of their activity (e.g. training) and too little for another part (e.g. lending).
These issues are mostly ignored on the public
authority side partly due to insufficient experience, but also because the "pilot
support" often granted to these initiatives is more flexible than mainstream public
programmes.
A further and very serious issue around poorly
designed government support programmes is that they may actually worsen the underlying
funding gap problem which they seek to combat: many programmes end up financing and
supporting publics that the mainstream banking sector could have financed. By doing so
these programmes allow mainstream banks to further disengage from less profitable sectors
and customers, thereby increasing the funding gap in the market place. A thorough analysis
of the overall effects of government support is therefore indispensable.
The challenge
The challenge of this project is to identify and
define public support frameworks which have similar qualities that local and micro-finance
initiatives try to achieve, namely accessibility, sustainability and independence. It is
precisely these qualities that these new financial instruments have solved for the
public they serve that the state will need to adopt in wanting to support these
financial instruments. The innovation needs to go one step up.
The
partners
New Economics Foundation
NEF is a research and policy institute seeking to build a just and sustainable
economy. Community finance is one of NEFs four major activity areas,
through which it has deeply influenced UK policy on local and microfinance, by research,
publications and participation in key government policy fora. NEFs international
work includes research, policy and capacity-building on local and microfinance.
New Economics Foundation
Mr Thomas Fisher
Cinnamon House
6-8 Cole Street
London SE1 4YH
United Kingdom
Tel +44/20/7407 7447
Fax +44/20/7407 6473
Email thomas.fisher@neweconomics.org
Evers.Jung, Forshung und Beratung in
Finanzdienstleitungen-Financial services. Research and Consulting
EVERS & JUNG is a research and consulting firm
working on innovations in financial services. It aims at the development and
implementation of social financial services which effectively support their target group
in an economically efficient way
Contact : Jan Evers or Martin Jung
Raboisen 96
D-20095 Hamburg
Tel +49 40 320 82 32
Fax +49 40 320 82 90
Email Jan.Evers@eversjung.de
or Martin.Jung@eversjung.de
http://www.eversjung.de
Fondazione Choros
Fondazione Choros works to improve global human
growth and to promote social economy and ethical finance at a national and international
level. It aims at developing applied research projects, concrete support to microcredit
programs by financing innovative and socially relevant projects and fundraising to support
countries affected by war or social, economic and environmental crisis.
Fondazione Choros
Piazza dei Signori, 1
35139 Padova
Italy
Tel +39-49-654191
Fax +39-49-8755714
E-mail address foschi@choros.it
http://www.choros.it
INAISE
INAISE is the international network of about 50 new
social economy finance organisations that have come up throughout Europe these last 10 to
20 years to serve local development, micro-businesses, the environment and social economy
organisations.
INAISE
Chaussée de Charleroi 51B
B-1060 Brussels
Belgium
Tel +32 2 234 57 97
Fax +32 2 234 57 98
Email inaise@inaise.org
http://www.inaise.org
Contac persons :
Christophe Guene
Email CGuene@swing.be
Viviane Vandemeulebroucke
Email : inaise@inaise.org
Casestudies
The analysis and outputs of the project will be built
on case studies (of good or bad practice) of public support measures for local and
micro-finance.
- They will illustrate public support measures that
support local and micro-finance (NOT casestudies of local and micro-finance practice
itself, although the impact of the measures on local and micro-finance organisations will
be a critical part of the analysis).
- They will analyse the issues that face public support
for local and micro-finance. The cases can review positive or negative experiences,
including measures that would be helpful, but local and micro-finance organisations
struggle to get access to.
- The cases can be from outside the EU, if they
effectively illustrate good or bad public support for local and micro-finance.
 
|